On this page
GJC seeks rollback of 67% hallmarking fee hike, warns of fake stamps
Our read
Higher hallmarking costs are likely to squeeze jewellers' cash flow before fee relief arrives, with some costs reaching customers.
For operators
Plan for ₹75-per-article hallmarking and 24–36-hour turnarounds, while strengthening stamp verification to protect customer trust against the fake-stamp risk flagged by GJC.
Watch
An official notification retaining ₹75 or restoring ₹45 per article
Ask next
The report,
GJC sought restoration of ₹45-per-article hallmarking charges from ₹75, warning that higher costs could encourage fake stamps. The council estimates around ₹400 crore in additional costs besides roughly ₹80 crore in GST, while turnaround has risen to 24-36 hours.
up 66.67%
Reported figures
From the report. Source details below
| Hallmarking charge increase: | 66.67% |
|---|---|
| Jewellery articles hallmarked in 2025-26: | 132.2 million |
| Districts with adequate BIS app awareness: | about 10% |
Why it matters to operators
Assess jewellery targets’ hallmarking access, verification controls and ability to absorb higher compliance costs, without assuming GJC’s rollback request will succeed.
What to watch next
- Reported turnaround times shortening or exceeding 24–36 hours
- Retail invoices showing higher hallmarking-related charges
- Enforcement findings confirming or challenging GJC's fake-stamp warning
- Jewellers reporting higher inventory or working-capital requirements
Likely next moves
Our read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.
- GJC is likely to press its rollback demand with evidence of higher ecosystem costs and longer turnaround times.
- Jewellery retailers are likely to pass some additional hallmarking costs to customers where competitive pressure permits.
- Jewellery retailers may hold more already-hallmarked stock to protect availability, increasing working-capital needs.
- Hallmarking authorities may review stamp-verification safeguards before agreeing to a full fee rollback.