On this page
HUL takes Horlicks into protein shakes and powders to target India’s mainstream nutrition market
Our read
HUL's primary opportunity is not to win the existing fitness-protein market but to make protein a mainstream daily nutrition habit; repeat purchase at accessible price points will determine whether Horlicks becomes the category's mass-market gateway or remains a premium trial product.
For operators
HUL is using Horlicks’ trusted mass-nutrition positioning and broad distribution to make protein more accessible through ₹120 ready-to-drink shakes and affordable powder servings, beginning with urban consumers.
Watch
Repeat purchase and subscription rates for the ₹120 RTD shake after initial sampling periods.
Ask next
The report,
HUL is testing Horlicks Protein ready-to-drink shakes and recently expanded into powders, targeting India’s underpenetrated mainstream protein market. It will initially focus on urban users, leveraging Horlicks’ nutrition positioning, accessible pricing, HUL distribution and fermented yeast-based protein.
Reported figures
From the report. Source details below
| HUL foods revenue: | ₹14,061 crore in FY26 |
|---|---|
| Foods share of HUL revenue: | 22% |
| Horlicks annual revenue: | over ₹2,000 crore in 2023 |
| Protein powder sachet price: | about ₹83 per serving |
| Ready-to-drink protein shake price: | ₹120 |
| Indian households consuming protein products: | about 3% |
| India whey protein market: | $178.45 million in 2025; projected $221.98 million by 2031 |
| India protein supplements market: | $912.9 million in 2025; projected $1.58 billion by 2034 |
| HUL Q1FY27 price hikes: | 5% |
| HUL Q4FY27 volume growth: | 6% |
| HUL Q1FY27 revenue: | ₹17,341 crore, up 10% YoY |
Why it matters for the brand
HUL’s move signals that established FMCG nutrition brands are targeting protein whitespace, increasing the strategic value of differentiated formulations, functional-beverage capabilities, and distribution-ready nutrition assets.
What to track next
- Expansion from pilot urban markets into general trade, tier-2 cities, and HUL's rural distribution network.
- Evidence of cannibalization versus incrementality within Horlicks and other HUL nutrition beverages.
- Changes in pack sizes, introductory discounts, or effective per-serving prices, which would signal demand elasticity or margin pressure.
- Competitor launches of affordable protein RTDs, sachets, family packs, or mass-media campaigns framing protein as daily nutrition.
- Consumer response to taste, satiety, sugar content, protein quantity, and digestive tolerance in reviews and retailer feedback.
Show 1 more
- Modern-trade shelf placement and refrigerator availability, which will materially affect RTD velocity.
Likely next moves
Our read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.
- Expand distribution first through urban supermarkets, chemists, e-commerce, office-adjacent stores, and high-frequency convenience channels before a broader general-trade rollout.
- Use Horlicks' existing family-health equity to create distinct consumption occasions: breakfast replacement, post-work fatigue, school-age nutrition, and healthy snacking rather than gym-only usage.
- Prioritize sampling, bundle offers, and multipacks to convert single-serve experimentation into repeat purchase and measure whether RTD buyers subsequently adopt powder formats.
- Benchmark protein grams, sugar, calories, and price per gram against milk-based drinks, whey products, and incumbent health-food powders; reformulate or resize if value perception is weak.
- Expect competitors to increase claims around protein quality, lower sugar, digestive comfort, and affordability, raising scrutiny of formulation transparency and labeling.
Show 1 more
- If urban repeat rates are strong, HUL can use its distribution advantage to take protein nutrition into tier-2 cities, potentially expanding the addressable market faster than specialist brands can.
The counter-case
The case against this reading — not reported by the source.
Horlicks’ mass nutrition equity may not transfer cleanly to protein, where consumers increasingly scrutinize grams of protein, source quality, sugar content, amino-acid profile and price per gram. At ₹120 per RTD shake and about ₹83 per powder serving, the offering risks sitting in an awkward middle: too expensive for habitual mass-market consumption, yet potentially less compelling than specialist sports-nutrition brands for protein-aware buyers. Distribution can create trial, but repeat purchase will depend on taste, efficacy perception and whether households see protein as a daily necessity rather than an occasional premium add-on.
The source
First seen