On this page
ICEA seeks cut in mobile-phone GST to 5% as entry-level demand weakens
Our read
India smartphone makers shift from fighting for sub-₹10,000 volume to financing-led upgrades and refurbished sales unless GST relief materializes.
For operators
Prepare for sustained entry-level handset demand pressure by tightening sub-₹10,000 inventory exposure and emphasizing financing, trade-ins and value-led bundles.
Watch
GST Council agenda, Finance Ministry comments, or budget documents referencing handset-tax rationalization.
Ask next
The report,
ICEA has urged the government to cut mobile-phone GST from 18% to 5%, citing weak domestic demand, sharply higher memory costs and pressure on affordable smartphones. It says lower taxes could formalise sales, aid rural buyers and support handset manufacturing growth.
Reported figures
From the report. Source details below
| GST raised from 12% to 18% in April | 2020 |
|---|---|
| Smartphones below ₹10,000 now account for | less than 5% of supply |
| DRAM and NAND flash prices increased roughly four-fold since September | 2025 |
Also in the report
- Entry-level smartphone prices increased approximately 35%-45% over the last year
What to watch next
- Monthly India smartphone shipment data, especially sub-₹10,000 unit share and first-time buyer demand.
- NAND/DRAM spot and contract-price trends and OEM guidance on bill-of-materials inflation.
- Average selling price movement, discount intensity and inventory days at major online/offline channels.
- Changes in feature-phone shipments, refurbished-device sales and handset financing delinquency rates.
The counter-case
The case against this reading — not reported by the source.
ICEA has a direct incentive to frame weaker entry-level demand as a tax problem, but a GST cut may not translate fully into lower retail prices if component inflation, currency moves, channel margins and OEM pricing absorb the benefit. The cited 35%-45% price increase may apply to selected low-end configurations rather than the market broadly, while consumers may be shifting toward refurbished devices, feature phones or longer replacement cycles for reasons beyond GST. A 5% rate would also create significant revenue and rate-structure concerns for the government, making adoption unlikely.