Read the counter-case
On this page

Trader groups withdraw 'No UPI Day' call after meeting Sitharaman

Our read

UPI disruption risk falls immediately; any shift in omnichannel payment economics awaits formal policy, not trader demands.

For operators

Keep UPI acceptance steady after the boycott withdrawal, while modeling the traders’ proposed 0.20% MDR from FY 2026–27 as a cost scenario—not confirmed policy.

Watch

Official government, RBI or NPCI announcements distinguishing consultation from approved policy.

Ask next

The report,

AIMRA and AICPDF withdrew their October 2 'No UPI Day' protest after meeting Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman. They sought a phased MDR rollout starting at 0.20% in FY 2026-27, a ₹5 lakh threshold and exemptions for merchant-to-merchant transfers.

Newer report on another story , , ET Small Business : IIT Bombay report urges limiting NPCI's proposed 0.4% UPI MDR to merchants with turnover above Rs 50 crore

Channel facts

From the report. Source details below

  • 0.05%
  • 0.40%
  • ₹1 lakh
  • 0.4%

What it means for online and offline

Stress-test payments partnerships and acquisition targets under alternative MDR scenarios, including the requested merchant-to-merchant exemptions, without treating trader demands as settled policy.

Signals to track

  • Confirmation, rejection or modification of the requested 0.20% rate and FY 2026–27 timing.
  • Definitions and eligibility rules for merchant-to-merchant exemptions, including safeguards against transaction reclassification.
  • Renewed boycott notices or observable changes in merchant UPI acceptance.
  • Provider contract notices specifying fee incidence and revenue allocation.

Likely next moves

Our read of what comes next — analysis, not reported by the source.

  • Trader bodies seek written commitments on the proposed rollout timetable and merchant-to-merchant exemptions.
  • Retailers model exposure by channel, transaction value and supplier-payment flows without treating the requested rate as enacted.
  • Banks and payment providers prepare alternative pricing and classification approaches if formal consultation begins.

The counter-case

The case against this reading — not reported by the source.

The withdrawal removes a threatened disruption but does not establish a payments-policy shift. The proposed 0.20% MDR and merchant-to-merchant exemptions remain trader demands, so projecting changes to retailer costs, payment-provider revenue or omni-channel strategy would be premature. If boycott participation was likely to be limited, even the immediate operational significance may be modest.

The source

Source Read the source at Outlook Business

Published

Confirmed by ET Small Business

First seen